How healthy is your relationship? Take the quiz

Reading Time: 5 minutes Is your partner’s behavior normal or a big red flag that they might be controlling or abusive? Take our quiz to see if you’re in a healthy relationship.

14 ways to build better money habits today

Reading Time: 12 minutes Easy ways to stop spending all your money.

7 steps to pain-free budgeting

Reading Time: 6 minutes As a student, sometimes the money goes out faster than it’s coming in. Learn how to track your spending with this step-by-step guide. (Your future self will thank you.)

Know how to protect yourself from getting sick? Take the quiz

Reading Time: 3 minutes Test your knowledge of how to prevent common infections with this quiz.

3 reasons why you should get the flu shot this year

Reading Time: 5 minutes The flu virus is contagious, so how much can our healthy habits help us compared to getting the flu shot?

Upgrade your sleep: Simple bedroom solutions

Reading Time: 9 minutes From decor, to temperature, to white noise, fellow students offer their tips on how to make your bedroom a sleep-happy space.

7 ways to lower your risk of STIs

Reading Time: 12 minutes Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are increasingly common among young people. Here are seven simple ways you can lower your STI risk.

How you can help prevent sexual assault of people with disabilities

Reading Time: 10 minutes Studies of sexual assault consistently show a higher rate of victimization of people with disabilities compared to nondisabled people. The good news? You can get involved.

How to empower students to intervene when someone they know is experiencing intimate partner violence

Reading Time: 6 minutes

When young people experience intimate partner violence (IPV), they’re most likely to disclose it to their friends. Therefore, it’s critical that we give students the tools to support a friend who may be experiencing IPV. These four strategies can help.

1. Focus on strategies for intervening

Focus on ways students can help each other. Overemphasizing the warning signs of abuse risks sending the message to students that they must determine definitively whether they’re witnessing an abusive interaction as a prerequisite to helping. That said, it’s important that students have some familiarity with the signs of relationship abuse.

2. Train students to intervene early, subtly, and frequently

We want students to intervene when they witness obvious abuse and violence—but we don’t want them to hold off until they see that. We also want them to intervene much sooner and in much less severe situations: when they witness or experience casual disrespect, sexual pressure, or disregard for personal boundaries. Here’s why this works:

  • Intervening subtly and frequently feels more doable than larger, one-time interventions. It’s what students already do as good friends: checking in, listening, showing support.
  • Students are more likely to witness disrespectful behavior, like a belittling comment or low-level pressure, than they are to witness unmistakable abuse, like a sexual assault or physical battery.

3. Keep your examples diverse

Relationship abuse is difficult to address in part because of common misunderstandings about why and how abuse happens, and who it happens to. In workshops and other educational messaging, use stories featuring people of diverse genders, sexualities, races, and socioeconomic classes. If you use gender-neutral examples, be alert to whether students are “filling in” the missing information according to gender stereotypes.

4. Be prepared for students to disclose to you

When students disclose assault and abuse, it’s typically to friends. That said, students, or friends of students, experiencing intimate partner violence may turn to a faculty member, administrator, or trusted mentor for help accessing resources. The strategies in our article provide guidance for that conversation. In addition, familiarize yourself with the intimate partner violence resources on your campus and in your local community. Students aren’t always comfortable using campus-based resources, so it helps to have backups. Know your reporting obligations under Title IX to ensure that you and your students are aware of the limits of confidentiality.

Read the article to learn more.

Get help or find out more [survey_plugin] Article sources

Hana Awwad and Evan Walker-Wells contributed to this article.

Melanie Boyd, PhD, assistant dean of student affairs, Yale University, Connecticut.

Casey Corcoran, MAT, program director, Futures Without Violence, California.

Dana Cuomo, PhD, coordinator of victim advocacy services, University of Washington.

Rachel Pain, PhD, professor, Department of Geography; co-director, Centre for Social Justice and Community Action; Durham University, UK.

Anderson, D. K., & Saunders, D. G. (2003). Leaving an abusive partner: An empirical review of predictors, the process of leaving, and psychological well-being. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(2), 163–191.

Barnett, O. W. (2000). Why battered women do not leave, part 1: External inhibiting factors within society. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1(4), 343–372.

Barnett, O. W. (2001). Why battered women do not leave, part 2: External inhibiting factors—social support and internal inhibiting factors. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2(1), 3–35.

Barrett, B. J., & St. Pierre, M. (2011). Variations in women’s help seeking in response to intimate partner violence: Findings from a Canadian population-based study. Violence Against Women, 17(1), 47–70.

Barter, C., McCarry, M., Berridge, D., & Evans, K. (2009, October). Partner exploitation and violence in teenage intimate relationships. NSPCC. Retrieved from

Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2005). Understanding stay/leave decisions in violent relationships: A behavior analytic approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 14, 21–45.

Bennice, J. A., & Resick, P. A. (2003). Marital rape: History, research, and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4(3), 228–246.

Beres, M. A. (2014). Rethinking the concept of consent for anti-sexual violence activism and education. Feminism and Psychology, 24(3), 373–389.

Beres, M. A. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(1), 1–14.

Bergen, R. K. (1996). Wife rape: Understanding the response of survivors and service provider. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brieding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Basile, K. C., Walters, M, L., et al. (2014, September 5). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence—National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 63(SS08), 1–8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from

Burke, J. G., Gielen, A. C., McDonnell, K. A., O’Campo, P., et al. (2001). The process of ending abuse in intimate relationships: A qualitative exploration of the Transtheoretical Model. Violence Against Women, 7(10), 1144–1163.

Carmody, M., & Ovenden, G. (2013). Putting ethical sex into practice: Sexual negotiation, gender, and citizenship in the lives of young women and men. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(6), 792–807.

Casey, E. A., Querna, K., Masters, N. T., Beadnell, B., et al. (2016). Patterns of intimate partner violence and sexual risk behavior among young heterosexually active men. Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 239–250.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2003). Costs of intimate partner violence against women in the United States. CDC, National Centers for Injury Prevention and Control: Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from

Clark, S., & Hamby, S. (2011). Challenges and resources of survivors of domestic violence. [Presentation]. Retrieved from

Crockett, E. (2017, January 10). Many mass shooters have a history of domestic violence. It’s time to pay attention. Vox. Retrieved from

DeKeseredy, W., Rogness, M., & Schwartz, M. (2004). Separation/divorce sexual assault: The current state of social scientific knowledge. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 675–691.

Edwards, K. M., Dardis, C. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2012). Women’s disclosure of dating violence: A mixed methodological study. Feminism & Psychology, 22(4), 507–517.

Enander, V. (2011). Leaving Jekyll and Hyde: Emotion work in the context of intimate partner violence. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 29–48.

Goldenberg, T., Stephenson, R., Freeland, R., Finneran, C., et al. (2016). “Struggling to be the alpha”: Sources of tension and intimate partner violence in same-sex relationships between men. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(8), 875–889.

Humphreys, C., & Joseph, S. (2004). Domestic violence and the politics of trauma. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, 559–570.

Kelly, T., & Stermac, L. (2012). Intimate partner sexual assault against women: Examining the impact and recommendations for clinical practice. Partner Abuse, 3(1), 107–122.

Lindgren, K. P., Parkhill, M. R., George, W. H., & Hendershot, C. S. (2008). Gender differences in perceptions of sexual intent: A qualitative review and integration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 423–439.

Mabry, D. (2015, September 16). Seeking an end to cycles of abuse. Radio Rookies. WNYC. Retrieved from

Mahlstedt, D., & Keeny, L. (1993). Female survivors of dating violence and their social networks. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 319–333.

McFarlane, J., & Malecha, A. (2005). Sexual assault among intimates: Frequency, consequences and treatments. Research report for US Department of Justice. Retrieved from

Miller, B., & Irvin, J. (2016). Invisible scars: Comparing the mental health of LGB and heterosexual intimate partner violence survivors. Journal of Homosexuality.

Montalvo-Liendo, N. (2009). Cross-cultural factors in disclosure of intimate partner violence: An integrated review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(1), 20–34.

National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2015). Facts about domestic violence and sexual abuse. Retrieved from

National Domestic Violence Hotline. (n.d.). Love is respect. Retrieved from

National Domestic Violence Hotline. (2014, May 29). What is gaslighting? Retrieved from

O’Byrne, R., Hansen, S., & Rapley, M. (2008). ‘‘If a girl doesn’t say ‘no’. . .’’: Young men, rape and claims of “insufficient knowledge.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(3), 168–193.

O’Byrne, R., Rapley, M., & Hansen, S. (2006). “You couldn’t say ‘no,’ could you?”: Young men’s understandings of sexual refusal. Feminism & Psychology, 16(2), 133–154.

Orchowski, L. M., & Gidycz, C. A. (2015). Psychological consequences associated with positive and negative responses to disclosure of sexual assault among college women: A prospective study. Violence Against Women, 21(7), 803–823.

Rainy. (2015, September 16). Why do I stay? Radio Rookies. WNYC. Retrieved from

Rausch, M. A. (2016). Systemic acceptance of same-sex relationships and the impact on intimate partner violence among cisgender identified lesbian and queer individuals. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 11(3–4), 270–284.

Rennison, C. M. (2002). Rape and sexual assault: Reporting to police and medical attention, 1992–2000. Retrieved from

Stith, S. M. (2006). Future directions in intimate partner violence prevention research. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 13(3–4), 229–244.

Taylor, L. R., & Gaskin-Laniyan, N. (n.d.). Sexual assault in abusive relationships. NIJ Journal, 256. Retrieved from

Tina. (2015, January 25). When you’re the abuser. Represent. Retrieved from

Tina. (2015, September 16). Living both sides of abuse, and choosing neither. Radio Rookies. WNYC. Retrieved from

Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey. US Department of Justice. Retrieved from

van Schalkwyk, S., Boonzaier, F., & Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2014). “Selves” in contradiction: Power and powerlessness in South African shelter residents’ narratives of leaving abusive heterosexual relationships. Feminism & Psychology, 24(3), 314–331.

WNYC. (2015, September 16). Where to find help. Retrieved from

Woodyatt, C. R., & Stephenson, R. (2016). Emotional intimate partner violence experienced by men in same-sex relationships. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 18(10), 1137–1149.

Yale Sexual Harassment and Assault Response & Education Center. (n.d.). Sexual Misconduct—Intimate Partner Violence. Retrieved from

5 strategies for reducing the incidence of sexual assault among people with disabilities

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Students with disabilities are at heightened risk of sexual assault and abuse, and are less able to access support services and legal justice, research shows. The same is true of students with emotional health conditions who may not identify as disabled. How can colleges help prevent these students from being targeted and support those who have experienced sexual assault and abuse? These five strategies can help:

1. Conceptualize disability broadly

Around 11 percent of US undergraduates identify as disabled, according to the Department of Education. This largely excludes students experiencing severe loneliness or anxiety, depression or chronic illness, or past trauma. Emotional health issues and disability can increase students’ isolation and vulnerability to sexual assault, experts say. “Community power dynamics have enormous impact,” says Dr. Melanie Boyd, assistant dean of student affairs at Yale University. “Social status can dictate who gets targeted, who is granted the right to advocate for themselves, [and] who is seen as a legitimate self-advocate.”

2. Ensure that sexual consent policies are inclusive

Colleges can help build a culture in which everyone’s bodily autonomy and communication is respected. Sexual assault policies should recognize every adult student’s right to consensual sex, and the right to be heard and presumed competent, with or without disabilities.

Learn more about disability and consent

3. Guide students in establishing inclusive social norms and practices

“How do you address people’s vulnerabilities without reaffirming those in some way? Build structures and practices that accommodate them without calling them out,” says Dr. Boyd, who oversees Yale’s Consent and Communication Educators program. This means helping students reconsider the social accessibility of experiences such as school dances or half-time at the big game. Inclusive cultural norms support all student populations.

4. Keep the needs of survivors with disabilities in perspective

Survivors with disabilities have largely the same needs as those without disabilities, says Colby Bruno, senior legal counsel at the Victim Rights Law Center, a legal service in Massachusetts representing sexual assault victims. “Sexual assault victims [may have] suicidal ideologies and think they are to blame,” says Bruno. Skilled advocates and health care providers can help meet students’ disability-specific needs (e.g., HIV prophylaxis treatment following a sexual assault may interact with other medications).

5. Build supportive networks for students with disabilities

Mentor relationships and disability-informed support services can be protective against assault and improve students’ access to resources. Support networks should include designated faculty, advocates, office hours and spaces, disability-informed counseling, and representation in student government.

[school_resource sh101resources=’no’ category=’mobileapp,wellnesspromotion, healthservices, studentservices, studentlife, counselingservices, studentsucess, titleix’] Get help or find out more Article sources

Melanie Boyd, PhD, assistant dean in student affairs; lecturer in women’s, gender, and sexuality studies, Yale University, Connecticut.

Colby Bruno, Esq., JD, senior legal counsel, Victim Rights Law Center, Massachusetts.

Michael Glenn, LICSW, clinical social worker and sex educator, Massachusetts.

Isabelle Hénault, PhD, director, Clinique Autisme et Asperger de Montréal, Quebec.

Albrecht, G. L., & Devlieger, P. J. (1999). The disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds. Social Science and Medicine, 48(8), 977–988.

American College Health Association. (2016). American College Health Association—National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2016. Hanover, MD: American College Health Association.

Balderian, N. (1991). Sexual abuse of people with developmental disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 9(4), 323–335.

Brieding, M., & Amour, B. (2015). The association between disability and intimate partner violence in the United States. Annals of Epidemiology, 25(6), 455–457.

Brown-Lavoie, S. M., Viecili, M. A., & Weiss, J. A. (2014). Sexual knowledge and victimization in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(9), 2185–2196.

California Coalition Against Sexual Assault (CALCASA). (2010). Creating access: Supporting survivors of sexual assault with disabilities. Retrieved from

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2006). Behavioral Risk Factor Survey 2006: Survey data and documentation. Retrieved from

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015). Key findings: Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults, US—2013. Retrieved from

Francavillo, G. S. R. (2009). Sexuality education, sexual communication, rape myth acceptance, and sexual assault experience among deaf and hard of hearing college students. DRUM, University of Maryland. Retrieved from

Johnson, I., & Sigler, R. (2000). Forced sexual intercourse among intimates. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 95–108.

Khan, A. (2015, February 12). The hidden victims of campus sexual assault: Students with disabilities. Retrieved from

Keilty, J., & Connelly, G., (2001). Making a statement: An exploratory study of barriers facing women with an intellectual disability when making a statement about sexual assault to police. Disability & Society, 16(2), 273–291.

Martin, S. L., Ray, N., Sotrez-Alvarez, D., Kupper, L. L., et al. (2006). Physical and sexual assault of women with disabilities. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 823–837.

Mitra, M., Mouradian, V. E., & Diamond, M. (2011). Sexual violence victimization against men with disabilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(5), 494–497.

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Fast facts: Students with disabilities. Retrieved from

Obinna, J., Krueger, S., Osterbaan, C., Sadusky, J. M., et al. (2005). Understanding the needs of the victims of sexual assault in the deaf community. Researching Sexual Violence Project. Retrieved from

Sobsey, D., & Doe, T. (1991). Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sexuality and Disability, 9(3), 243–259.

Stimson, L., & Best, M. C. (1991). Courage above all: Sexual assault against women with disabilities. Toronto Disabled Women’s Network: Toronto.

Stockburger, S., & Omar, H. A. (2015). Women with disabilities: Reproductive care and women’s health. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development, 8(4), 429–447.

CampusWell survey, November 2016.

Sullivan, P. M. & Knutson, J. F. (1994). The relationship between child abuse and neglect and disabilities: Implications for research and practice. Omaha, NE: Boys Town National Research Hospital.

Tame the tension: Science-backed ways to talk it out

Reading Time: 6 minutes

Rate this article and enter to win 
How often are you baffled by someone’s refusal to share (or even see) your point of view? As a species, humans are not terribly effective at changing other people’s minds, a frustration that all of us have likely encountered online and in person, or maybe in class. Commonly, we react to the other person’s point of view rather than listening and responding thoughtfully. As a result, we often don’t hear others—and aren’t heard ourselves. Part of this is about human brain baggage: Psychological research has revealed the subconscious biases that make us resistant to unwelcome evidence. That said, it’s not hopeless. The following techniques can help us communicate more effectively—strengthening our relationships, reducing our stress, and setting us up for the Nobel Peace Prize (or at least a good grade for class participation).

Prep: 4 ways to get ready for a tense convo

1. Decide whether it’s worth the effort

Not every annoyance is worth a fight, according to Jonathan Herring and Leigh Thompson in Learn the Art of Logic and Persuasion (FT Press, 2013). If you argue about everything that bothers you, “you’re going to end up stressed out, frustrated, and damaging your relationship,” they write. Be selective with your arguing energies. If an issue is causing you emotional distress, that’s a clue that it may be worthwhile to talk it through.

2. Pick a good time

Instead of telling the person that you want to talk, ask if now (or later, or tomorrow) would be a good time. “When you ask someone if they want to talk, it makes them feel like you’re being considerate of them,” says Tracy Hornig, director of mediation at the Center for Resolutions, a nonprofit providing dispute resolution services in Pennsylvania.

3. Jot down your points

Write a letter to the person or notes for yourself. This can help you work out what to say and think about how it may come across. Realizing what not to say is useful too. For example, it’s OK to talk about the impact of abolishing taxes or outlawing guns, but don’t make assumptions about the other person’s intention—we commonly get this wrong.

4. Determine a backup plan

Decide beforehand that if you start to feel out of control, you’ll take time out. “One thing people do in conflict is react,” says Hornig. “When things are getting heated, the ability to get grounded is key.” Try listening to music, watching some funny videos, or talking with a supportive friend.

Recovery: 3 steps to getting past a disagreement1. Reframe your frustration

It’s OK if you don’t manage to change someone’s mind. Humans are quirky creatures, and our quirks include a resistance to evidence that seems to threaten our own worldviews. “When your deepest convictions are challenged by contradictory evidence, your beliefs get stronger,” blogged David McRaney, author of You Are Not So Smart (Gotham, 2011)—a phenomenon known as the “backfire effect.” It’s OK to disengage from an argument and reconvene later (or not). Often, your time and energies can be used more productively elsewhere.

2. See what you can learn from it

Think about your experience through the lens of the five steps outlined in this article. We can all benefit from becoming better listeners, finding common ground, and seeing positive elements in positions that don’t work for us overall. We can gain a better sense of where someone is coming from without having to agree with their conclusions. Sometimes, we won’t see eye-to-eye no matter how hard we try, and it’s OK to agree to disagree. This isn’t necessarily about giving ground. These are skills that can help us personally and professionally throughout our lives. Arguments aren’t going away—we’ll all get plenty of opportunities to practice.

3. Use mechanisms for preventing future feuds

If your argument is with the people in your life, look for solutions that can satisfy all parties. For example, if you’re arguing with roommates over who should do the chores, you might not agree on whose turn it is, but you can probably all agree that the house should be kept clean—so suggest that you create a chore schedule to assign tasks and avoid future conflict. For a roommate agreement template, see Get help or find out more.

6 science-baked ways to make your argument more successful1. Use “I” statements

Statements that start with “I feel” or “I think” will help you avoid giving the impression that you’re blaming or accusing. “It’s hard for someone to tell you that what you’re feeling or what you think is wrong,” says Hornig. “After saying how you feel, explain why you feel that way.”

2. Pay attention to your language and tone

“Think about the words you’re choosing and how you’re responding, because it will affect how they respond,” says Hornig. Considered, thoughtful responses are more effective than quips, according to a 2016 study by researchers at Cornell University. Avoid insults and blameworthy phrases like, “You’re wrong” or “Just calm down.” (Probably no one in history has ever calmed down because they were told to.) This is where those “I” statements come in handy.

3. Don’t quote the person you’re arguing with

This can be hard to resist. But quoting the other person comes across as nitpicky. It can also be unfair, because we all use language casually sometimes. After all, these are conversations and comment threads, not legal briefings. If you’re homing in on their wording, you’re unlikely to influence their opinion, according to the 2016 Cornell study.

4. Address points that the other person didn’t

Say the other person isn’t impressed by the concept that same-sex marriage is about equal rights. Try talking instead about love and family. This strategy worked effectively for LGBTQ campaigners. In the 2016 Cornell study, online arguments were relatively effective when their points and themes were different from those of the original poster.

5. Use real-life examples and anecdotes

Abstract concepts, such as “justice” or “racism,” are less compelling than real-life examples, according to research. Similarly, we tend to find personal stories more affecting than statistics—although statistics can help show that the stories we’re telling aren’t unusual.

6. Team up

Arguments are more persuasive when they’re coming from a group, according to the 2016 study. That said, don’t make the other person feel targeted. Social dynamics are as relevant online as they are face-to-face. “There are lots of social group formation, hierarchies, and dynamic structures that can have considerable effects on how things move and evolve both online and consequently in the off-line world,” Dr. Taha Yasseri, a researcher at the Oxford Internet Institute in the UK, told the Washington Post.

5 steps to constructive conflict

1. Let the other person make their point

Really pay attention to what the other person is saying or writing. Let them finish their thoughts. “Active listening” includes concentrating on (and understanding) the other person’s position, instead of making assumptions about their intention and thinking about what you’ll say next. When it’s your turn to talk or comment, ask them to do the same.

2. Summarize their position

“What I heard you say was….” Aim to be clear, vivid, and fair. Ideally, the other person will wish they’d put it that way. This time-honored advice came from the late social psychologist Anatol Rapoport and was among his key rules for constructive arguing. Rapoport’s rules are the best way to avoid caricaturing and mocking your opponent, says the philosopher Daniel Dennett.

3. Mention any points of agreement

The other person will be more receptive if they know you recognize where your perspectives overlap, especially on points that don’t already have widespread acceptance. For example, we can all agree that life is fairer when everyone is able to reach their potential. What’s harder is agreeing on the best ways to make that happen. If you and the other person are in sync on parts of this, point that out.

4. Acknowledge what you have learned from your opponent

We can learn from each other even when we’re not in full agreement. Again, this is about demonstrating that you’ve considered their points and are approaching this in good faith. This approach makes your opponent more receptive to your dissent, as Dennett points out in Intuition Pumps and Other Tools for Public Thinking (Norton, 2013).

5. Then give your response

Only now should you venture into rebuttal, disagreement, or criticism. And yes, how you handle this matters. Some strategies may be familiar to you—others likely won’t.

[survey_plugin] Article sources

Tracy Hornig, director of mediation, Center for Resolutions, Pennsylvania.

Anuradha, L. R., & Yagnik, V. S. (2012, April). Improving positive mental wellness among adolescents: Current need. Delhi Psychiatry Journal, 15(1). Retrieved from

Deffenbacher, J., & Spielberger, C. (2011, October). Strategies for controlling your anger. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from

Dewey, C. (2016, February 11). How to win a Facebook argument, according to science. Washington Post. Retrieved from

Gallo, A. (2014, June 16). Choose the right words in an argument. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

Hashmi, S. (2013). Adolescence: An age of storm and stress. Review of Arts and Humanities, 2(1). Retrieved from

Herring, J., & Thompson, L. (2012). Learn the art of logic and persuasion. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Maiese, M. (2003, October). Negotiation. Beyond Intractability. Retrieved from

McRaney, D. (2011, June 10). The backfire effect. You Are Not So Smart. Retrieved from

Overton, A. R., & Lowry, A. C. (2013, December). Conflict management: Difficult conversations with difficult people. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery, 26(4), 259–264.

Popova, M. (2014, March 28). How to criticize with kindness: Philosopher Daniel Dennett on the four steps to arguing intelligently. BrainPickings. Retrieved from

Segal, J., & Smith, M. (2016, November). Conflict resolution skills: Building the skills that can turn conflicts into opportunities. Retrieved from

Tan, C., Niculae, V., Danescue-Nikulescu-Mizil, C., & Lee, L. (2016). Winning arguments: Interaction dynamics and persuasion strategies in good-faith online discussions. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on the World Wide Web, 613–624. Retrieved from

University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire. (2012, September 14). Building healthy relationships. Retrieved from